Email quarantine: getting it right

Email quarantine: getting it right
Wednesday 28 November, 2018
Councils, like other employers, have obligations to protect their employees from harm. Quarantining abusive or offensive emails is one method of doing so. However, Councils must tread carefully.
In a recent report, the Chief Ombudsman was highly critical of Horowhenua District Council’s previous approach to quarantining emails to staff. Emails from several senders were re-routed to the Chief Executive. The Council had no policy about quarantining emails and its practices were unreasonable. Many emails did not reach the intended recipient despite not being abusive. In several cases there was no record of the reasons why a person’s emails had been quarantined. The Chief Ombudsman noted that in respect of three individuals it was difficult to identify a clear basis to suggest that Council had grounds to add them to the quarantine list. Several people were not notified that their emails were being quarantined. In some cases the quarantine went on for several years without review.
The Chief Ombudsman emphasised that poor record keeping practices fundamentally undermine the operation of LGOIMA and reduce transparency and accountability. Horowhenua has now implemented a quarantine policy which addresses the Chief Ombudsman’s concerns.
For assistance with abusive complainants, including email quarantine policies, please contact Megan Crocket or Kate Cornegé
Related Articles

Councils remain liable for compliance of contractors with the Resource Management Act
Thursday 18 March, 2021

Can the end use of an activity be considered in a resource consent application?
Thursday 18 March, 2021

Whether a lapsed consent can be revived by waiver and time limit extension powers
Monday 7 December, 2020

Natural justice adrift in Schmuck v Northland Regional Council [2020] NZHC 590
Monday 7 December, 2020

Could companies be liable to the public for the harm caused by their emissions?
Tuesday 10 March, 2020

Avoiding double penalties when sentencing a company and director
Thursday 23 April, 2020

Draft National Policy Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity released on 26 November 2019
Thursday 12 December, 2019

Can an easement be granted over an esplanade reserve for a commercial activity?
Thursday 12 December, 2019

How can you identify the subject of an anonymous defamatory statement?
Thursday 10 October, 2019

Australian defamation decision raises risk for public Facebook pages
Wednesday 31 July, 2019

Local authority requiring monetary contributions on designations
Thursday 20 June, 2019

Bella Vista: MBIE Report highlights failure to perform statutory functions
Tuesday 9 April, 2019

Chief Ombudsman upholds Auckland Council's restrictions on stadium reports
Wednesday 28 November, 2018

Recent decision on "affected persons" highlights the importance of context
Wednesday 28 November, 2018

Court of Appeal recognises new public interest defence to defamation claims
Thursday 27 September, 2018

High Court finds Council liable in negligence for damage from fallen tree
Thursday 27 September, 2018

Court upholds sensible approach to local authority works on private property
Tuesday 24 July, 2018
